I'm telling you she's just another lying black liberal whore.
ST. LOUIS After 60 days, five pleadings, four meetings and one hearing,
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardners Office has not produced a single
document to Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's Office seeking to
oust her, according to court documents filed late Monday.
The only thing the Circuits Attorneys Office has produced is delay,
according to Missouri Attorney General Andrew Baileys filing. But the
time for delay is over. This Court should compel the Circuit Attorneys
Office to fulfill its discovery obligations.
But exactly what judge will rule on these matters remains unclear.
On Friday, Gardners legal team filed a motion requesting a new judge
replace Judge John Torbitzky. Asking for a change of judge is a right
afforded to both sides of a trial, and often a trial strategy.
The attorney generals office is arguing Torbitzky should rule on the
motions that are already before him even though hes been dismissed, and
cite a case Torbitzky himself presided over as the legal precedent that
gives Torbitzky that duty.
Torbitzky has not yet signed off on the request to replace him.
Bailey is seeking to remove Gardner from office, accusing her of willfully
neglecting her duties. The Missouri Supreme Court appointed Torbitzky to
preside over the matter after all 30 of the judges in the 22nd Judicial
Circuit recused themselves, believing they could be called as witnesses by
the attorney general.
Torbitzky also scheduled status hearings to take place every first and
third Tuesday of the month until the matter goes to trial should he
decide it is worthy of proceeding to trial. The first of those status
hearings was to take place Tuesday, but that has now been cancelled.
Statements Gardner made during a weekend event at a church along with
evidence her office filed in response to a hearing to determine whether to
hold her or someone from her office in contempt for missing a murder trial
are cited in the attorney generals new filing.
The states top prosecutor has asked for all documentation related to how
several cases were handled along with text messages, emails and other
documentation all information Gardners legal team has asserted is
privileged information, irrelevant, and, in some cases, too burdensome
to produce.
Any claim that such information is irrelevant and privileged has been
refuted by her own actions, according to the filing.
On April 24, former Assistant Circuit Attorney Alex Polta appeared before
Judge Scott Millikan to explain why he missed a murder trial. Gardner did
not appear in court, but sent Assistant Circuit Attorney Rob Huq and her
personal attorney, Michael Downey, in her place.
In order to avoid a contempt finding in that case, Gardner sought to pass
the buck to her subordinates, according to the filing. In service of
that goal, she produced text messages between her subordinates.
The text messages discuss decision-making within the office; the text
messages appear to be between employees on their private phones; and the
text messages use the names of witnesses in a discussion analyzing the
relevant importance of the witnesses to the case. Not only did Gardner
produce all this information in four dayswhich belies any claim that such
information is too difficult or burdensome to produceshe filed it in a
document publicly available on Missouri Case.net. In light of her actions
in the Jones case, she cannot now raise burden, privilege, or related
arguments.
In a 13-minute speech during an event at a church Saturday, Gardner
accused police union leaders of telling her they would let her win an
election as long as she didnt hold any officers accountable; leads an
office that has disinvested in; and discussed her previous service as an
assistant circuit attorney. 5 On Your Side was the only media outlet that
captured Gardners remarks, which you can read in full here.
In the filing, the state argues Gardners own words now prove all of the
documents related to those topics are even more relevant. But the attorney
generals office further argues that it does not appear that anyone
theyve been talking to about the case knows exactly what records
Gardners office keeps.
The Circuit Attorneys Office has made no effort to search its records
for nearly two months, according to the filing. Having delayed, it
cannot now claim that there is not enough time to produce the records it
refused to search for.
The attorney general also accused Gardner of allowing a disbarred attorney
Maurice Foxworth to consult on cases and cited how Assistant Circuit
Attorney Chris Hinckley did not appear to comply with a deadline Torbitzky
gave on a legal filing.
"Despite filing the exact same document twice on April 26, 2023, associate
counsel for the Circuit Attorneys Office, Christopher Hinckley,
inaccurately certified that he filed the response on April 25, 2023,"
according to the filing.
The filing concluded: It is not in the publics interest to lengthen
these proceedings; it is in the publics interest to know whether Gardner
has forfeited her office and is merely a usurper of the office of Circuit
Attorney."
<https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/gardner-lawsuit/missouri-
attorney-general-andrew-bailey-st-louis-circuit-attorney-kim-gardner-
documents/63-fc41c506-0966-48e7-929b-01cf21799d74>